Conflicts Accusations — MoFo ‘Skullduggery’ Suggested & A Confidential Conflict

MoFo Accused of ‘Skullduggery’ in Divorce of Google Search Engine Programmer” —

  • “The wife of Scott Hassan, robotics entrepreneur and principal programmer of the Google search engine, is suing Morrison & Foerster for being a ‘willing architect and facilitator’ of Hassan’s scheme to ‘cheat’ her out of millions of dollars after she filed for divorce in 2015.”
  • “In a suit filed Tuesday in Santa Clara County Superior Court, Allison Huynh alleges that Morrison & Foerster violated its ethical and fiduciary duties when the firm picked sides after representing the couple individually in separate business matters.”
  • “The complaint alleges that Paul ‘Chip’ Lion, a Palo Alto MoFo partner, and the firm continued to represent Hassan and some of the couple’s jointly owned businesses even after a family court judge disqualified them from advising him on the dissolution of their marriage.”
  • “Huynh says the firm ‘orchestrated a fire-sale’ of the assets of robotics company Suitable Technologies, which she has a half interest in, according to the complaint. She alleges the deal was an effort to score a personal tax benefit of more than $90 million for Hassan.”
  • “‘We deny all the allegations made by the Plaintiff against the Firm and its representatives and we will address them in the proper forum,’ a firm spokesperson said via email.”

Conflict arises in synagogue shooting defense” —

  • “More than a year into the prosecution of the man accused of firing on a Poway synagogue — killing one person and injuring three others — a conflict of interest has arisen on his defense team.”
  • “Attorneys Kathryn Nester, who is executive director of the federal public defender office, and Kimberly Trimble conferred with three experts, all of whom have vast experience in trying death-penalty cases, and all came to the conclusion that this was not a conflict that can be waived by Earnest, they said in a court filing. They declined to give more details on the conflict.”
  • “‘The nature of the conflict is protected by attorney-client privilege,’ they wrote.”
  • “Attorney and judge conflicts of interest are carefully vetted at the beginning of each case. For one to arise this late is unusual.”
If you liked this post, please share it: